A- de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil
✓Claimant Nelsa Irene Herrera Espinosa
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Exceso en la potestad reglamentaria
- Incompetencia para introducir modificaciones al decreto de tutela en materia de competencias
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se decidió no aplicar el Art. 1º, numeral 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000 por ser contrario a la Constitución.
En consecuencia, se declaró que de acuerdo con el conflicto planteado, el Juzgado Cuarto Penal Municipal de Medellín, es competente para conocer el proceso de tutela de la referencia.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (5 points)
- PRIMERO. No aplicar el articulo 1o, numeral 1o del Decreto 1382 de 2000.
- SEGUNDO. Declarar que, de acuerdo con el conflicto planteado, el Juzgado
- Cuarto. Penal Municipal de Medellin, es competente para conocer el proceso de tutela de la referencia.
- TERCERO. Remitir, por medio de la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, el expediente al Juzgado
- Cuarto. Penal Municipal de Medellin, para lo de su competencia.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.